Also, our own bodies produce much more formaldehyde in a single day than we ever get in vaccines. There is actually more formaldehyde in a single pear than there is in a child’s vaccine schedule. ![]() Person 1: Everything is bad for you if the dosage is high enough but the amount of formaldehyde in vaccines in insignificant. Person 2: Oh yeah! Vaccines have formaldehyde! And formaldehyde is bad for you. So even if mercury in vaccines of the past did contain mercury, the amount that they contained wasn’t enough to cause autism. If mercury in vaccines caused autism, we’d expect the autism incident rate to have fallen since 2001 but it hasn’t. All vaccines except the flu vaccine have been mercury-free since 2001. Person 1: There is no mercury in vaccines. Person 2: Vaccines are bad because the mercury in vaccines causes autism. Basically, when person 1 shows why person 2’s argument fails, person 2 responds by saying “oh yeah? what about this?” Instead of admitting defeat, person 2 changes the standard of evidence or changes the topic to one that is closely related but not the same as the original one. Person 1 shows why person 2’s argument fails. Moving the Goal Posts (aka the “Oh Yeah, What about this?” Defense) Definition: A topic is under discussion. Red herrings are often used by arguers (especially politicians) to avoid having to answer a question. Red Herring Definition: When an arguer brings up an issue or line of argument that isn’t directly relevant to the original issue being debated in order to divert attention away from it. Red Herring Fallacy and Moving the Goal Posts The problem is that Person B hasn’t shown that person A’s actual argument (X). Person B then shows why argument Y is a bad argument.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |